As the physical demands of modern football continue to rise, tracking player movement data has become essential for identifying top-performing young talents. Leveraging the advanced capabilities of the Comparisonator Physical Data Comparison Module, we’ve analyzed the UEFA Conference League 3rd Qualifying Round to spotlight the best players across three critical physical parameters during the 2025/26 season so far.
This detailed analysis equips clubs, scouts, and analysts with valuable insights into emerging athletes whose physical performances set them apart on the pitch. Powered by AI and extracted from broadcast data, these metrics provide accurate and contextual benchmarks for player evaluation.
In the Sprinting Distance category—tracking movement >25 km/h—Danijel Sturm leads the rankings, demonstrating consistent high-tempo involvement. Akim Zedadka tops the charts in Max Speed covered, emphasizing his exceptional endurance and work rate. Meanwhile, Jákup Andreasen excels in Running Distance, showcasing his explosiveness and frequent high-speed runs exceeding 15-20 km/h.
These findings not only highlight Europe’s next generation of talent but also reinforce the strategic value of physical analytics in recruitment and squad building. Stay tuned as we continue to reveal more data-driven standouts throughout the season.
Please note that all numbers are per 90 min data from the 2025/26 Season – So Far.
Akim Zedadka’s CompaGPT Physicals report:
In the selected matches against Levski Sofia, where Sabah faced defeats with scores of 0-2 and 1-0, Akim Zedadka played a total of 184 minutes. His standout attribute was his Max Speed, where he achieved an average of 35.32 per match, ranking him 2nd out of 84 players in the same position. This places him just behind Nikita Iosifov, who led with a 35.78 average. Zedadka’s Max Speed indicates his capability to rapidly cover ground and make dynamic movements, vital for a full-back in counter-attacking scenarios and defensive recovery.
Akim Zedadka’s best ranking parameters in the analyzed matches were his Max Speed and Max Speed (Top 5 Match Avg), where he consistently ranked 2nd among his peers. These metrics demonstrate his physical capabilities that contribute strategically to Sabah’s defensive and attacking transitions. While his sprinting distance and endurance metrics didn’t lead the rankings, they still indicate a solid level of physicality that supports his tactical role as a right back, particularly in maintaining pressure and supporting counter-attacks. Zedadka’s performance can be tactically significant in scenarios requiring rapid recovery and involvement in high-paced plays, making him a valuable asset in matches that demand extensive physical exertion.
Akim Zedadka (’95) (RB) – Sabah
Max Speed
Jakup Andreasen’s CompaGPT Physicals report:
In the selected matches against Neman Grodno, Jákup Andreasen exhibited significant strengths in running distance, achieving a ranking of 1st among 175 players in his position, with an impressive average of 2460.34 per match. This places him slightly ahead of Filip Krovinovic, who averaged 2454.43. This exceptional running distance indicates Andreasen’s capacity to cover ground effectively, suggesting he may be instrumental in both defensive duties and supporting offensive plays through his positioning and stamina. Another notable aspect is Andreasen’s total distance covered, averaging 14053.43, ranking him 3rd in his position. This is noteworthy when compared to the top performers Filip Krovinovic and Robert Ljubicic, who recorded averages of 15402.45 and 14865.51 respectively. Andreasen’s high total distance underscores his ability to remain active and engaged throughout the match, supporting both defensive and offensive strategies.
Jákup Andreasen’s most notable performance metrics include ranking 1st in running distance, and achieving a 3rd place ranking in both total distance covered and running distance in the second half of matches. These parameters highlight his impressive stamina and work rate, which can be tactically significant for maintaining a robust midfield presence and supporting both defensive and offensive phases of play. His ability to cover extensive ground consistently positions him as a valuable asset in midfield strategy, emphasizing his role in facilitating transitions and maintaining defensive resilience.
Jakup Andreasen (’98) (CMF) – KI
Running Distance
Danijel Sturm’s CompaGPT Physicals report:
His sprinting distance was also notable, leading the rankings with an average of 600.09 per match. These metrics indicate Sturm’s ability to consistently apply pressure and create opportunities through quick bursts of speed, vital for breaking defensive lines and supporting offensive transitions. While Sturm ranked second in sprinting distance during both halves (324.35 in the first half and 275.74 in the second half), these figures emphasize his consistent effort and stamina across match periods. This capability is tactically significant as it ensures continuous threat on the wing, maintaining pressure on the opposition throughout the game. Sturm was second in high intensity distance, averaging 1297.11 per match, and sprint count, with 33. These parameters underscore his relentless work rate and commitment to high-energy play, contributing to both defensive recoveries and offensive drives. His ability to cover ground at high intensity is pivotal for maintaining team shape and exploiting spaces on the field.
Danijel Sturm’s standout performances in high acceleration count, sprinting distance, and high deceleration count highlight his dynamic physical presence and tactical importance on the field. His ability to effectively execute high-intensity runs and maintain consistent pressure on the opposition showcases his role as a key player in Celje’s attacking strategy. These strengths are critical for creating scoring opportunities and disrupting opposing defenses, making him an asset in high-stakes competitive matches.
Danijel Sturm (’99) (LW) – Celje
